Relevance of The New York Times

Growing up, I knew the New York Times to be one of the most reputable new sources in the world. It is still today one of the most widely read news sources, while it is held to such a high standard, however, that does not separate it from one problem in particular like any other newspaper.

It is subject to not only author bias, but also the editors, and more importantly the Chief Editor. The articles aren’t summarizations or strictly fact based essays, they are written from one’s point of view, and are revised and edited by another person’s own bias. The New York Times is one such paper; it is subject to left wing prejudices, for that exact reason my father discontinued receiving it nearly 6 years ago. Regardless of its very left wing ideals, it is one of the best ways to receive the news. Therefore, like many others I put aside my dislike for such a bias and read it anyway, usually online.

Whenever I read the New York Times I see so many different interesting articles, usually about the Middle East and Asia, many of which I would never have noticed elsewhere. They report very in depth about the ongoing wars, and the impending doom that seems to be engulfing those regions. The articles describe tension between the U.S., Iran, China, and many other super powers. The articles usually hold a more democratic viewpoint, and I usually notice such things because overall the paper itself is known for that. Had I not known for so long I might overlook certain ideals.

In general I believe reading the New York Times not only benefits my knowledge of world events, furthermore, it enhances my writing abilities. While the writing itself may not be the highest level like a thesis paper by a college grad, it suffices for an interesting, informative read.